Quote in The Guardian 3/23/2015:
“Faced with a nationwide scarcity of execution drugs, Utah’s governor on Monday signed into law a bill that resurrects the use firing squads as an alternative method of executing condemned inmates.”
Governor Gary Herbert belongs to the LDS Church. Do they approve of murder? If he were the one to pull the trigger would he actually do it? Is there any difference in authorizing murder and doing it yourself? The governor gave the reason that the drugs used for the execution were difficult to obtain. Does anyone wonder why the European countries who made the “scarce” drugs are not making them anymore or are not exporting them? Maybe they grew a conscience.
First, there is no moral reason that our government should authorize any executions, never mind by firing squad. Yes, there have been many heinous crimes committed, and those people should pay a price for their crimes. Keep them locked up for life. Make them work to pay for their keep. They are not a threat to the public when they are incarcerated. Governor Gary Herbert belongs to the LDS Church. Do they approve of murder?
Not all, but a lot of heinous crimes are committed under the influence of drugs and or alcohol by mostly young, stupid people. The rest are committed by people suffering from mental illness. (Does anyone doubt that Jeffery Dahmer was mentally ill?)
After years in prison, they may not be the same person who committed that crime. That does not absolve them, but it does change the dynamics of punishment.
One hundred and fifty prisoners in America who were sent to death row since 1973 have later been exonerated. Some have even been under 18 years old. Others have been executed despite serious doubts about their guilt. They may have had poor legal representation, it may have been more a matter of racial injustice, it may have been mistaken identity. Execution is final and there is no turning back or second chances. It also has not made a difference in the amount or type of crimes committed in the US.
Lets hear your ideas on this volatile topic.